Problem Statement 1
Many people discover the underwater world and learn the basic rules of diving. However, very few people understand that the sources of the diving rules are very simple physiological and physical laws. Consequently many don’t internalize the rules, underestimate their values, take risks and eventually have an accident. The purpose of this document is to make the fundamental physiological and physical laws comprehensible to all so that the diving rules become meaningful to divers and are fully internalized.
Problem Statement 2
Ideally, experienced divers should internalize the rules and know the inherent risks in diving. However, studies show that the more experienced a diver is, the more likely they are to have an accident. Experienced divers think they can cut corners, that the rules are for beginners; what they do not realize is that diving rules are grounded on human physiology and physics. No matter how experienced or physically fit a diver is, there are limits the human body cannot pass. This document will reduce and hopefully prevent diving accidents by negligence of the rules by
Problem Statement 3
As divers become more experienced, they become cocky and feel that the rules are for beginners because they were never taught why the rules exist. The rules are based on human physiology and physics. No matter the diving experience or physical fitness, the human body cannot go past a certain limit. This misconception and lack of information leads to diving accidents which can result in death. This document will inform divers the reasoning behind the rules, allowing them to internalize the rules, and ultimately prevent diving accidents.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I believe that the first problem statement is the best one. It clearly outlined the situation, problem, and solution. I could easily understand it. The second problem statement did not flow well. It was wordy and the structure was hard to understand. The third problem statement seemed a bit subjective to me. It seemed too opinionated decreasing the author's credibility to the audience.
I enjoyed the second problem statement the best. I think it catches you when you elude to the fact that experienced divers think that the rules do not apply to them. I think this happens many times not just in diving, most all recreational activities really. I think it hooks both the experienced diver out of frustration about the comment and the beginner giving them confidence that experienced divers must comply to the rules just like they do.
I liked number 1 the best because it made aware the problem first which is the main thing I'm concerned about, not necessarily being a perfect diver. I don't necessarily want to be the best class diver (ideal situation). I just don't want to get hurt.
i liked number one the best. the other two made it seem as if your proposal would only apply to experienced divers, but the first statement would make the proposal appealing to divers of all experience levels. it flowed well and it was the easiest to understand exactly what your purpose was. after reading it, i knew exactly what the problem/solution was.
Post a Comment